Construction DisputeResolution HandbookConstructionDispute ResolutionHandbookEngineers’ Dispute Resolution HandbookSecond editionBy a specialist team of authors inKeating ChambersEdited byDr Robert Gaitskell QC CEngPublished by ICE Publishing, 40 Marsh Wall, London E14 9TP.Distributors for ICE Publishing books areUSA: Publishers Storage and Shipping Corp., 46 Development Road,Fitchburg, MA 01420First edition published 2006This edition 2011Also available from ICE PublishingICE Manual of Construction Law.V. Minogue and M.P. O’Reilly (eds).ISBN 978-0-7277-4087-8Client Best Practice Guide.Institution of Civil Engineers Best Practice Panel.ISBN 978-0-7277-3650-5Dispute Boards: Procedure and practice.G.

  1. Nottingham Building Society V Eurodynamics Systems 1993 F.s.r. 468 1
Nottingham Building Society V Eurodynamics Systems [1993 F.s.r. 468F.s.r.Society

ISBN 978-0-7277-3508-9www.icevirtuallibrary.comA catalogue record for this book is available from the British LibraryISBN: 978-0-7277-4145-5# Thomas Telford Limited 2011ICE Publishing is a division of Thomas Telford Ltd, a wholly-ownedsubsidiary of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE).All rights, including translation, reserved.

Nottingham Building Society V Eurodynamics Systems 1993 F.s.r. 468 1

Claire Lawson looks at the new injunction provisions set out in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 ‘The rules and accompanying practice directions in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 remain silent on the definition of an interim injunction and the circumstances in which such an order should be made.’In ‘Protective measures’, FLJ 107, June 2011, p5. There was a risk of substantial injustice by not granting the injunction if the purchase did not proceed and the deposit was forfeited. The court’s overriding consideration was which course of action was likely to involve the least risk of injustice if it turned out to be wrong (Nottingham Building Society v Eurodynamics Systems 1993 FSR 468). The guidelines which a court should follow in applications for interim injunctions are well established. They can be found in the cases referred to by the Judge in his judgment:- American Cyanamid v Ethicon Limited 1975 AC 396, Nottingham Building Society v Eurodynamics Systems Plc 1993 FSR 468 and NWL Limited v Woods 1979 1 WLR 1294.